Predictive modelling leads the comparison
Our comparison pages now open with the thing that actually separates Componentry from every other maintenance app: it models what your components will do next, rather than only recording what they have already done.
Three capabilities now lead every comparison table:
- Chain power loss, in watts — split into contamination, lubrication state, and chain stretch, so you can see how much you get back with a clean and a re-lube versus genuine wear
- A lifespan based on how you actually ride — weighted by your terrain, intensity, weather exposure, descending, and volume, rather than the number on the box
- A predicted replacement date — an actual date each component runs out, plus race-day readiness projections
No other app in the comparison offers any of them.
Clearer language about how predictions work
We have also gone through the FAQ and comparison copy to describe the prediction system more precisely. Componentry's estimates come from a physical model with published inputs — anchored to lab friction data from CeramicSpeed, Friction Facts, and SILCA — and you can see the per-factor breakdown behind every component's estimate. Where our wording previously suggested something looser, it now says exactly what the system does.